I think injustice was adverted by
the issuance of a stay of execution on November 7, 2011 in the case of Hank
Skinner. There are several sides to the
story in this case and many questions are still unanswered as to what happened
that night. It is important to make sure
an innocent man is not put to death.
Therefore, these questions must be answered and it must be determined
who exactly is responsible for the murders that night before a man, who may
possibly be innocent, is punished with the death penalty.
I thought the “dueling” websites
regarding Hank Skinner’s case were very interesting. They were set up in the same design, but each
presented a variety of ideas from the case that could prove his innocence or
guilt. Both websites are in support of
major public concerns about the case.
One is worried about finding justice for Twila Busby and her family,
while the other is concerned with giving an innocent man the death penalty. Both sides have strong opinions from the
public eye. They only included
information that supported their view of Skinner; they did not mention facts of
the case unless they could explain them in a way that followed their story from
that night. Both websites seem very
biased and I do not believe either one contains only facts.
The media seems to be split in a
similar way to the two websites about Skinner’s case. The media wants to find justice for Twila
Busby, her two sons, and their family they left behind when they died, but the
media is also concerned with what the DNA evidence might find and if an
innocent man has been punished with the death penalty. I think the media is pushing for the testing
of the DNA evidence to obtain more information about this case and in order to make
sure the right man is being punished for these crimes.
No comments:
Post a Comment